Score: 10

"Silly captain....."

submission: The Truth Behind Columbia

date: February 2, 2003

The best thing about this is the annoyance factor it incurs with the self righteous among you that declare that my world must stop because people I don't know died.

Here's a joke for you:

Why do the people at mission control drink coca cola? Because they can't drink seven up.

YEs, I'm going to hell. But that's where all the fun people are anyway.

I love this film.....

Score: 0

"We really don't care if you did have permission..."

submission: I am a cow

date: July 13, 2001

...(which you probably didn't), if the author wanted to put it up, they'd put it up themselves. Therefore, you movie stealing tosser, you get 0.
If only these idiots giving you high scores would stop and think.

Score: 8

"Heh...."

submission: Newgrounds: 3 Years Later

date: July 9, 2001

Liked the way it was kind of a very cut down portal...the spoof reviews hit the nail on the head.
Might not be the greatest looking movie, but it's not meant to be. Course, the thicko's who vote high for porn will completely miss the point, but will vote high anyway because of the amount of flesh.

See gfreaks review if you think I'm taking the piss.

Score: 10

"Can't believe I never reviewed this...."

submission: Emmit Nervend

date: July 7, 2001

...It is good. Check out prikedelik's review as well.

Score: 10

"A classy tribute to the dead baby craze...."

submission: dead-baby-dance'n'die

date: July 7, 2001

...and it reminds me a lot of the old claymation series, Trapdoor (Not sure if this was shown outside the uk, but anyway).
And another thing....RTFlash smells. Now, stop trying to come top of the reviewers unless you have something to say, ya fucktard.

Score: 10

"The fact this isnt plain text means ...."

submission: The Bad Examples at NG

date: June 30, 2001

....I can give you five without feeling naughty. I agree with what you said and, erm, that's it.

Good to see the constant praising of the ngWo continues. Seems like sucking up WILL get you a 5. (Well, not really.)

Score: 0

"Suggestion for version 4...."

submission: Britney Viewer v3.0

date: June 25, 2001

...ram it up your arse.

Or, failing that, put it on your own site....Still, With these sodding banner ads my argument for NG not really being a porn site appears to have lost any validity.

Score: 0

"Greetings....."

submission: floating stick stuff

date: June 7, 2001

...this looks and sounds so damn familiar I'm sure it's a resubmission.
It's crap anyway, so enjoy the 0.....and if this gets blammed and you resubmit it, fear not cos I'll resubmit this review especially you.
ngWo - Ensuring there are more ngWo members movies in the top 50 than you have. And don't even think about getting more accounts cos that's naughty.

Score: 0

"You've submitted this before (There's a surprise)."

submission: to pump ngWo stress down

date: June 7, 2001

I did relieve my stress, but by voting a big fat 0 on it, not using the thing.
ngWo - Laying bad movies to rest.

Score: 0

"Another (zero) quality resubmission from...."

submission: stickdeathmachine

date: June 6, 2001

....Prikedelik.
Stop resubmitting. Resubmissions get an auto 0 from me. That's the way it goes.
If your stuff was wanted here, your original account wouldn't have been deleted.
ngWo - Cos mentioning it annoys the hell out of prikedelik.